0
What else can I help you with?
How are adding and subtracting integers related to adding and subtracting other rational numbers?
Adding and subtracting integers is a specific case of adding and subtracting rational numbers, as integers can be expressed as rational numbers with a denominator of 1. The fundamental rules for adding and subtracting integers—such as combining like signs and using the number line—apply similarly to other rational numbers, which can include fractions and decimals. The operations are governed by the same principles of arithmetic, ensuring that the properties of addition and subtraction, such as commutativity and associativity, hold true across both integers and broader rational numbers. Thus, mastering integer operations provides a solid foundation for working with all rational numbers.
Are all rational numbers a whole number?
Yes they are. Counting numbers: 1,2,3... Whole numbers: 0,1,2,3... Integers: ...-2,-1,0,1,2... Rational: all numbers that can be written as a fraction Irrational: non-repeating decimals such as pi Imaginary: numbers have the square-root of a negative number As you can see the rational numbers encompass all of the whole numbers These definitions are not completely accurate, but it gets the message across.
Are ratios always rational?
No, but the reverse is true. All rational numbers are ratios but not all ratios are rational. You will often come across π being defined as the RATIO of the circumference of a circle to its diameter (there are other definitions). However, the word "rational" is derived from "ratio".
Name the set or sets of numbers to which the real number belongs?
Say if the number is a whole,integer,rational, or irrational. For example: -3.5 is irrational. But 2 is whole, integer, and rational. * * * * * The above is absolute rubbish. -3.5 is rational (-7/2), not irrational. Also, it mentions the subsets of real numbers, whereas the question is about what the real numbers are a subsets of - the supersets of real numbers. Actually, the set of real numbers is probably the largest set of numbers that you will come across in Secondary School (age 16-ish). If you continue with mathematics beyond that you will come across complex numbers: real numbers are a subset of complex numbers. There are supersets of complex numbers as well but you will not come across them unless you study mathematics to a seriously high level.
The densest subset of real numbers is the set of fractions?
Your question is ill-posed. I have not come across a comparison dense-denser-densest. The term "dense" is a topological property of a set: A set A is dense in a set B, if for all y in B, there is an open set O of B, such that O and A have nonempty intersection. The rational numbers are indeed dense in the set of real numbers with the standard topology. An open set containing a real number contains always a rational number. Another way of saying it is that every real number can be approximated to any precision by rational numbers. There are denser sets, if you are willing to consider more elements. Suppose you construct a set consisting of the rational numbers plus all algebraic numbers. The set of algebraic numbers is also countable, but adding them, makes it obviously easier to approximate real numbers. Can you perhaps construct a set less dense than the set of rational numbers? Suppose we take the set of rational numbers without the element 0. Is this set still dense in the real numbers? Yes, because 0 can be approximated by 1/n, n>1. In fact, you can remove finite number of rational numbers from the set of rational numbers and the resulting set will still be dense in the set of the real numbers.
Are there numbers that cannot be expressed in scientific notation?
Well, no - but yes. All numbers that people would come across in ordinary life can certainly be so expressed. As can all numbers that most scientists (other than mathematicians) are likely to come across in the context of their profession. So, in normal circumstances, the answer is no. But, with some very, very large numbers even the scientific notation becomes cumbersome. For example, googolplex is 10 to the power of 100100 so, in scientific notation it would be 10 raised to the power of 1 followed by 100100 zeros. And there are larger numbers.
Is the square root of negative 25 a rational number?
The square root of -25 is not a real number, as it involves taking the square root of a negative number which results in an imaginary number. In this case, the square root of -25 is 5i, where i represents the imaginary unit. Since rational numbers are a subset of real numbers, the square root of -25, being an imaginary number, is not a rational number.
When was the modern number system invented?
It was invented in prehistoric times and has evolved as our understanding and needs developed.From natural (counting) numbers to the set of integers, to rational numbers (fractions) to real numbers (incorporate irrational numbers), to complex numbers and then quaternions. The last of these, which even many mathematicians will not have come across in their work, were formally introduced to the world of mathematics by Hamilton in 1843.
what are the steps to multiply fractions?
you multiply the top numbers straight across, then you multiply the bottom numbers straight across
A step-down transformer has 525 turns in its secondary and 12500 turns in its primary If the potential difference across the primary is 3510 V what is the potential difference across the secondary?
The potential difference across the secondary coil will be 147.42 Volts
Are routing numbers consistent across all branches of the same bank?
Yes, routing numbers are consistent across all branches of the same bank.
Name a device that helps to maintain a potential difference across a conductor?
volt meter is the device that helps to maintain a potential difference across a conductor
