When comprehensive information is required. It may also be the better option if the characteristic of interest is important but very rare. In such a case, a sample may give an underestimate.
When comprehensive information is required. It may also be the better option if the characteristic of interest is important but very rare. In such a case, a sample may give an underestimate.
When comprehensive information is required. It may also be the better option if the characteristic of interest is important but very rare. In such a case, a sample may give an underestimate.
When comprehensive information is required. It may also be the better option if the characteristic of interest is important but very rare. In such a case, a sample may give an underestimate.
Chat with our AI personalities
When comprehensive information is required. It may also be the better option if the characteristic of interest is important but very rare. In such a case, a sample may give an underestimate.
census is conducted for group data so if it is a sampling data is taken it would lead to lot of non sampling errors
Less time and less cost for a sample.
A census would get data from 100% of the population (or at least close to 100%). Sampling would be to get data from some of the population (much less than 100%).
Sampling can be more accurate than a census as there is greater control of interviewers and less chances of mistakes being made as the data is collated
A questionnaire has little to do with sampling technique. Sampling technique is to do with who gets the questionnaire and that can be any sampling technique: the questionnaire can be sent to everyone (census), to a random sample, stratified random samples, to random samples in clusters, by quota or convenience. Or a pile of questionnaires can be left for respondents to pick up - self-selection.