I suggest you use an heuristic approach by setting yourself a computationally smaller problem, namely, how many combinations of 3 numbers in ascending order can be made from the digits 0 through 5?
This is 'computationally smaller' in the sense that one can write down all of the combinations in a couple of minutes.
(0, 1, 2)
(0, 1, 3)
(0, 1, 4)
(0, 1, 5)
(0, 2, 3)
(0, 2, 4)
(0, 2, 5)
(0, 3, 4)
(0, 3, 5)
(0, 4, 5)
(1, 2, 3)
(1, 2, 4)
(1, 2, 5)
(1, 3, 4)
(1, 3, 5)
(1, 4, 5)
(2, 3, 4)
(2, 3, 5)
(2, 4, 5)
(3, 4, 5)
Not only that, when I write them down in this way I see that, in writing them systematically (to ensure that I have them all) I notice that they are in ascending order! So this question is equivalent to asking how many ways there are of choosing 3 items from 6 (without any conditions).
Going back to the original question I now know that one need not write out all of the combinations, I can simply calculate the number of ways of choosing 6 items from 52, which is 20358520.
7
The question contradicts itself. The order of the letters is irrelevant in a combination [though it does matter in a permutation]. So what is it that you are asking for? Combinations or order-dependent arrangements?
Simple enough to solve. The answer is a power of two. Assuming you have two possible digits, say for example, 3 and 4, then you simply have to multiply it by how many numbers you want to get the total number of combinations. Each number can be 3 or 4 in this case, and you have 5 numbers. That's two to the fifth. Five combinations of any two numbers. 2x2x2x2x2. The answer is 32 combinations.
Assuming you are using the standard English alphabet, the number of combinations you can make are: 26 x 26 = 676 combinations.
9
You can make 5 combinations of 1 number, 10 combinations of 2 numbers, 10 combinations of 3 numbers, 5 combinations of 4 numbers, and 1 combinations of 5 number. 31 in all.
The question, as stated, cannot be answered because there are only 26 = 64 combinations. The order of the numbers in a combination does make a difference so 134 is the same as 143 or 413 etc. There are 1 combinations each of 0 and 6 of the numbers, 6 combinations of 1 or 5 numbers, 15 combinations of 2 or 4 numbers, and 20 combinations of 3 numbers. The list includes the null combination - that is the combination consisting of none of the numbers.
You can make 6 combinations with 3 numbers. They are: 123 213 312 132 231 321 * * * * * NO! Those are permutations! In combitorials, the order does not matter so that the combination 123 is the same as the combination 132 etc. So all of the above comprise just 1 combination. With three numbers you can have 1 combination of three numbers (as discussed above), 3 combinations of 2 numbers (12, 13 and 23) 3 combinations of 1 number (1, 2 and 3) In all, with n numbers you can have 2n - 1 combinations. Or, if you allow the null combination (that consisting of no numbers) you have 2n combinations.
Lots of different combinations can be used, one being: 1x2x3x15 We can see that in any order we multiply these numbers in it will equate to 90.
You could make 10*10*10*26*26*26 combinations, or 17576000 combinations.
This question does not make sense since a combination is independent of the order of its elements. That is, the combinations 1245 and 5142 are the same. Consequently, there can be no "last " numbers in a combination.
Only 1, since the order of the digits does not matter in a compbination. In a permutation, yes, but not combination.
Just one. In a combination, the order of the digits does not matter.
14 * * * * * Wrong! There are 15. 4 combinations of 1 number, 6 combinations of 2 number, 4 combinations of 3 numbers, and 1 combination of 4 numbers.
Their is 25 combinations
26 = 64 combinations, including the null combination - which contains no numbers.
35