positively skewed
The Uniform Distribution.
It is a positively skewed distribution.
Not directly, but the cumulative frequency contains the same information as the frequencies for the values in question. However, it may not show the full details of the distribution if the values have been grouped.
A simple continuous distribution can take any value between two other values whereas a discrete distribution cannot.
False. When the range is large you would use a grouped frequency distribution.
It is the set of values that a variable can take together with the probability or frequency distribution for those values.
Distribution is the set of values that a variable can take, along with measures relating to the likelihood of the variable taking those values.
The phenomenon where minority children show preferences for majority values or individuals is known as "internalized racism" or "internalized oppression." This occurs when minority individuals adopt the beliefs, values, and standards of the dominant culture, often leading to a devaluation of their own cultural identity. It can manifest in preferences for majority group members over those from their own group.
The answer depends on one side of WHAT! There is no distribution which has a greater number of values on either side of its median.
A skewness of 1.27 indicates a distribution that is positively skewed, meaning that the tail on the right side of the distribution is longer or fatter than the left side. This suggests that the majority of the data points are concentrated on the left, with some extreme values on the right, pulling the mean higher than the median. In practical terms, this might indicate the presence of outliers or a few high values significantly affecting the overall distribution.
The data values with the highest frequency, gives the peak of the distribution graph.
The Uniform Distribution.
It is a positively skewed distribution.
The reason the standard deviation of a distribution of means is smaller than the standard deviation of the population from which it was derived is actually quite logical. Keep in mind that standard deviation is the square root of variance. Variance is quite simply an expression of the variation among values in the population. Each of the means within the distribution of means is comprised of a sample of values taken randomly from the population. While it is possible for a random sample of multiple values to have come from one extreme or the other of the population distribution, it is unlikely. Generally, each sample will consist of some values on the lower end of the distribution, some from the higher end, and most from near the middle. In most cases, the values (both extremes and middle values) within each sample will balance out and average out to somewhere toward the middle of the population distribution. So the mean of each sample is likely to be close to the mean of the population and unlikely to be extreme in either direction. Because the majority of the means in a distribution of means will fall closer to the population mean than many of the individual values in the population, there is less variation among the distribution of means than among individual values in the population from which it was derived. Because there is less variation, the variance is lower, and thus, the square root of the variance - the standard deviation of the distribution of means - is less than the standard deviation of the population from which it was derived.
A quantile.
If it is a symmetric distribution, the median must be 130.
Not directly, but the cumulative frequency contains the same information as the frequencies for the values in question. However, it may not show the full details of the distribution if the values have been grouped.