answersLogoWhite

0

Yes, they are relatively prime.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Are 3 and 52 relatively prime?

A number cannot be "relatively prime" except in relation to another number. For example, 8 and 15 are relatively primebecause they contain no prime factors in common.


Is 8 and 118 relatively prime?

No.


Are 8 and 18 relatively prime?

no


Are 7 and 21 relatively prime?

27 is not a prime number and i dont know about 117 but i dont think its a composite # * * * * * The person who gave the above answer has no understanding of "relative primes". Or primes, for that matter. Neither 8 nor 9 is a prime BUT 8 and 9 are relatively prime (or co-prime) because they have no factor in common. That is what relatively prime means. 117 is not a prime, even if the previous answerer thinks otherwise. 27 and 117 are not relatively prime because both are divisible by 3.


Is 57 and 96 relatively prime?

No, 57 and 96 are not relatively prime because they share a common factor of 3.


Is 8 a relatively prime?

no it isn't because 4x2 =8.


Are 8 and 9 relatively prime?

Yes.


Is 3 a relatively prime?

no three is not a Prime number


What is true about all three pairs numbers 3 and 53 and 7 and 5 and 8?

They are relatively prime.


Can two odd numbers be relatively prime?

Yes, e.g. 3 and 5 are relatively prime, 27 (33) and 25 (52) are relatively prime...


What is the Least common multiple for 3 and 5 and 8?

Since they're relatively prime to each other, it's their product: 3 * 5 * 8 = 120


How many numbers between 20-30 are relatively prime to 25?

If you don't include 20, 25 and 30, all of the numbers in that range are relatively prime to 25.