0
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is 57 and 96 relatively prime?
No, 57 and 96 are not relatively prime because they share a common factor of 3.
What is relatively prime to 62?
3.
Are 3 and 12 relatively prime?
No, they are not.
Is 3 a relatively prime number?
no three is not a prime number
Are 30 and 36 relatively prime?
No, 30 and 36 are not relatively prime. They share the factors 3 and 6.
Are 3 and 52 relatively prime?
A number cannot be "relatively prime" except in relation to another number. For example, 8 and 15 are relatively primebecause they contain no prime factors in common.
Are 7 and 21 relatively prime?
27 is not a prime number and i dont know about 117 but i dont think its a composite # * * * * * The person who gave the above answer has no understanding of "relative primes". Or primes, for that matter. Neither 8 nor 9 is a prime BUT 8 and 9 are relatively prime (or co-prime) because they have no factor in common. That is what relatively prime means. 117 is not a prime, even if the previous answerer thinks otherwise. 27 and 117 are not relatively prime because both are divisible by 3.
Is 8 and 118 relatively prime?
No.
Are 8 and 18 relatively prime?
no
Is 57 and 96 relatively prime?
No, 57 and 96 are not relatively prime because they share a common factor of 3.
Is 8 a relatively prime?
no it isn't because 4x2 =8.
Are 8 and 9 relatively prime?
Yes.
Is 3 a relatively prime?
no three is not a Prime number
What is true about all three pairs numbers 3 and 53 and 7 and 5 and 8?
They are relatively prime.
Can two odd numbers be relatively prime?
Yes, e.g. 3 and 5 are relatively prime, 27 (33) and 25 (52) are relatively prime...
What is the Least common multiple for 3 and 5 and 8?
Since they're relatively prime to each other, it's their product: 3 * 5 * 8 = 120
How many numbers between 20-30 are relatively prime to 25?
If you don't include 20, 25 and 30, all of the numbers in that range are relatively prime to 25.
