Let's talk this out and see if we can work it out.
The sum of the first N odd integers means,
1+3+5+7+9+11+...
Where N is how many odd numbers we're adding.
Let's choose numbers for N, and see if we can find a pattern.
N=1 --> 1
(sum of the first odd integer)
N=2 --> 1 + 3 = 4
(sum of the first 2 odd integers)
N=3 --> 1 + 3 + 5 = 9
(sum of the first 3 odd integers)
N=4 --> 1 + 3 + 5 + 7 = 16
Do you notice a pattern yet? Take a look at when N = 2, what is the sum? That's right, 4!
and when N = 3... the sum is 9.
N = 4 the sum is 16....
I see a pattern, do you?
Answer: If you don't, you'll notice that the sum of the first N odd integers is always = N2
First of all, the sum of 3 odd numbers always equals an odd number and 176 is even so this is NOT possible.If you did not know this you could let n be the first odd number, n+2 is the next and n+4 is the third.Add them up and we have n+n+2+n+4=176 or3n+6=176 so3n=170Now you see that 170 is NOT divisible by 3 so ONCE again you see that there is NO solution to this problem. That is to say, there are NOT 3 odd consecutive integers whose sum is 176.
The arithmetic sequence of odd integers is 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, ... where the common difference is 2. The sum of the first thirty odd integers can be found by using the sum formula such as: Sn = n/2[2a1 + (n - 1)d], where a1 = 1, n = 30, and d = 2. So, S30 = (30/2)[(2)(1) + (30 - 1)(2)] = (15)[2 + (29)(2)] = (15)(60) = 900
The sum of two even numbers is always an even number. The sum of two odd numbers is always an even number.The sum of an even number and an odd number is always an odd number.Because integers alternate between even and odd, adding two consecutive integers will always result the sum of an odd number and an even number, which, as stated above, will always be an odd number.Another way to look at it:An even number is divisible by 2, therefore, 2*n (where n is an integer) is always an even number.2*n+1 would be the next number after 2*n (so 2*n & 2*n+1 are consecutive integers).If we add these numbers together, we get 4*n+1 = 2(2*n)+1. Since 2(2*n) is an even number, adding 1 makes it an odd number._________________________________________________________________________I'm not going to but in or anything, seriously that was a good answer
Let the integers be 'n' & 'n+2' Hence Their squares are n^(2) & (n+2)^(2) Their sum is n^(2) + (n+2)^(2) = 74 Expanding n^(2) + n^(2) + 4n + 4 = 74 2n^2 + 4n -70 = 0 n^2 + 2n - 35 = 0 Factor (n - 7)(n + 5) Hence n = '5' & '7' Odd and consecutive.
The sum of a sequence is given by sum = n/2(2a + (n-1)d) where: n = how many a = first number of sequence d = difference between terms of sequence. For the first 22 odd numbers these are: n = 22 a = 1 d = 2 → sum = 22/2(2×1 + (22 - 1)×2)) = 22² = 484 The sum of the first n odd numbers is always n²: sum = n/2(2×1 + (n-1)2) = n/2(1 + (n-1))×2 = n(n) = n²
n2+n
Sn = n^2
The formula for the sum of the squares of odd integers from 1 to n is n(n + 1)(n + 2) ÷ 6. EXAMPLE : Sum of odd integer squares from 1 to 15 = 15 x 16 x 17 ÷ 6 = 680
First of all, the sum of 3 odd numbers always equals an odd number and 176 is even so this is NOT possible.If you did not know this you could let n be the first odd number, n+2 is the next and n+4 is the third.Add them up and we have n+n+2+n+4=176 or3n+6=176 so3n=170Now you see that 170 is NOT divisible by 3 so ONCE again you see that there is NO solution to this problem. That is to say, there are NOT 3 odd consecutive integers whose sum is 176.
The arithmetic sequence of odd integers is 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, ... where the common difference is 2. The sum of the first thirty odd integers can be found by using the sum formula such as: Sn = n/2[2a1 + (n - 1)d], where a1 = 1, n = 30, and d = 2. So, S30 = (30/2)[(2)(1) + (30 - 1)(2)] = (15)[2 + (29)(2)] = (15)(60) = 900
False. let the integers be n, n+1 and n+2 3n+3 is there sum and we need this to be even for all integers n. if n is odd, then 3n is odd ( take n=5 3x5=15 odd) any odd number +3 is even. if n is even, then 3n is even and an even number plus and 3 is odd so the answer is false You could just say or prove it is false with a single counter example. Take the 3 consecutive integers, 2,3,4 their sum is 9 and you are done. I mentioned the 3n+3 so you can see why it is false for even set of 3 when the first of the 3 consecutive numbers is even.
n(n+2)(n+4) = 24
let n = first odd number; n + 2 = 2nd odd number ,etc. n + n+2 + n+4 + n +6 = 4n + 12 = -72 4n = -84 n = -21 -21,-19,-17 and -15
2n can be split into 2 n's so: n+n then add one to one of the n's and subtract one from one of the n's n+1+n-1 ^two consecutive odd integers^
Sum of first n integers is n/2 times n + 1 ie 27.5 x 56 which is 1540
The sum of two even numbers is always an even number. The sum of two odd numbers is always an even number.The sum of an even number and an odd number is always an odd number.Because integers alternate between even and odd, adding two consecutive integers will always result the sum of an odd number and an even number, which, as stated above, will always be an odd number.Another way to look at it:An even number is divisible by 2, therefore, 2*n (where n is an integer) is always an even number.2*n+1 would be the next number after 2*n (so 2*n & 2*n+1 are consecutive integers).If we add these numbers together, we get 4*n+1 = 2(2*n)+1. Since 2(2*n) is an even number, adding 1 makes it an odd number._________________________________________________________________________I'm not going to but in or anything, seriously that was a good answer
For three consecutive odd integers to have the sum 123, the equation N + N+2 + N+4 = 123 must be solvable with N being an odd integer.N + N+2 + N+4 = 1233N + 6 = 1233N = 117N = 39Since 39 is an odd integer, the solution is 39, 41, and 43.If N were even, or if N resolved to a non-integer, then the problem would have been incorrectly stated and unsolvable.