No, whole numbers are not closed under division. When you divide one whole number by another, the result may not be a whole number. For example, dividing 1 by 2 gives 0.5, which is not a whole number. Therefore, whole numbers do not satisfy the closure property for division.
The whole numbers are not closed under division! The statement is false since, for example, 2/3 is not a whole number.
No, whole numbers are not closed under division. It is possible to divide one whole number by another whole number and get a result which is not a whole number, for example, 1/2. One divided by two is a half.
The first need arose when it was found that the set of whole numbers was not closed under division. That is, given whole numbers A and B (B non-zero), that, in general, A/B was not a whole number - but a fraction.
No, the result of a division of one whole number into another might be a whole number, but could also be a fraction.
Yes.
The whole numbers are not closed under division! The statement is false since, for example, 2/3 is not a whole number.
The set of whole numbers is not closed under division (by non-zero whole numbers).
Integers are closed under division I think o.o. It's either counting numbers, integers or whole numbers . I cant remember :/
No, whole numbers are not closed under division. It is possible to divide one whole number by another whole number and get a result which is not a whole number, for example, 1/2. One divided by two is a half.
The set of whole numbers is not closed under division by a non-zero whole number. Rational numbers provide that closure and so enable the definition of division of one integer by a non-zero integer.
The first need arose when it was found that the set of whole numbers was not closed under division. That is, given whole numbers A and B (B non-zero), that, in general, A/B was not a whole number - but a fraction.
The numbers are not closed under addition because whole numbers, even integers, and natural numbers are closed.
It depends on your definition of whole numbers. The classic definition of whole numbers is the set of counting numbers and zero. In this case, the set of whole numbers is not closed under subtraction, because 3-6 = -3, and -3 is not a member of this set. However, if you use whole numbers as the set of all integers, then whole numbers would be closed under subtraction.
No, the result of a division of one whole number into another might be a whole number, but could also be a fraction.
If you can never, by multiplying two whole numbers, get anything but another whole number back as your answer, then, YES, the set of whole numbers must be closed under multiplication.
A set is closed under a particular operation (like division, addition, subtraction, etc) if whenever two elements of the set are combined by the operation, the answer is always an element of the original set. Examples: I) The positive integers are closed under addition, because adding any two positive integers gives another positive integer. II) The integers are notclosed under division, because it is not true that an integer divided by an integer is an integer (as in the case of 1 divided by 5, for example). In this case, the answer depends on the definition of "whole numbers". If this term is taken to mean positive whole numbers (1, 2, 3, ...), then the answer is no, they are not closed under subtraction, because it is possible to subtract two positive whole numbers and get an answer that is not a positive whole number (as in the case of 1 - 10 = -9, which is not a positive whole number)
Yes.