Let the number be n-2, n, n + 2
Hence their sum is
(n - 2) + n + ( n + 2) = 84
Summing the LHS
3n = 84
Divide by '3'
n = 28
Hence n - 2 = 26 The Answer
And n + 2 = 30
2
There are no such integers.
The numbers are -18, -16 and -14.
Yes, the product of any three consecutive numbers is divisible by 6. This is because among any three consecutive integers, at least one of them is even (ensuring divisibility by 2), and at least one of them is divisible by 3. Since 6 is the product of 2 and 3, the product of any three consecutive numbers is therefore divisible by 6.
The numbers are 52, 53 and 54.
The numbers are 16 and 17.
There are no such integers.
That isn't possible. The three consecutive number are assumed to be integers; the sum of three consecutive integers is always a multiple of 3 (try it out).
The numbers are -22, -21 and -20.
The average of three numbers which sum to 66 is 66/3 = 22. If 22 is the sum of three consecutive integers, then those three integers are 21,22,23. Kermit Rose
25, 26 and 27.
The numbers are 65, 66, and 67..
The numbers are -18, -16 and -14.
There is no set of three consecutive integers for 187.
The numbers are 52, 53 and 54.
The numbers are -6, -5 and -4.
The numbers are 16 and 17.
The numbers are 31, 32 and 33.