0
What else can I help you with?
What is q²-p² divided by q-p?
q + p
How do you write the negation of if and then?
If p then q is represented as p -> q Negation of "if p then q" is represented as ~(p -> q)
Simplify pp - q - q q - p?
p-q
How does every rational number have an additive inverse?
By definition, every rational number x can be expressed as a ratio p/q where p and q are integers and q is not zero. Consider -p/q. Then by the properties of integers, -p is an integer and is the additive inverse of p. Therefore p + (-p) = 0Then p/q + (-p/q) = [p + (-p)] /q = 0/q.Also, -p/q is a ratio of two integers, with q non-zero and so -p/q is also a rational number. That is, -p/q is the additive inverse of x, expressed as a ratio.
P-q and q-p are logically equivalent prove?
p --> q and q --> p are not equivalent p --> q and q --> (not)p are equivalent The truth table shows this. pq p --> q q -->(not)p f f t t f t t t t f f f t t t t
Where p and q are statements p q is called the of p and q.?
The expression ( p \land q ) is called the "conjunction" of statements ( p ) and ( q ). It is true only when both ( p ) and ( q ) are true; otherwise, it is false. In logical terms, conjunction represents the logical AND operation.
What are the different types of statements?
there are 32 types of thesis statements possible
How do you rewrite a biconditional as two conditional statements?
A biconditional statement, expressed as "P if and only if Q" (P ↔ Q), can be rewritten as two conditional statements: "If P, then Q" (P → Q) and "If Q, then P" (Q → P). This means that both conditions must be true for the biconditional to hold. Essentially, the biconditional asserts that P and Q are equivalent in truth value.
What are the origins of using p and q in if-then statements?
There is big deal. x and y are commonly used as variables, p and q are used a statements in logic.
Which of the following statements is true if p is an integer and q is a nonzero integer?
Then p/q is a rational number.
What is the negation of a conditional statement called?
The negation of a conditional statement is called the "inverse." In formal logic, if the original conditional statement is "If P, then Q" (P → Q), its negation is expressed as "It is not the case that if P, then Q," which can be more specifically represented as "P and not Q" (P ∧ ¬Q). This means that P is true while Q is false, which contradicts the original implication.
What does p and q mean?
In logic, "p" and "q" are commonly used symbols to represent propositions or statements that can be either true or false. They serve as variables in logical expressions and are often used in conjunction with logical operators like "and," "or," and "not" to form more complex statements. For example, in the expression "p and q," both propositions need to be true for the overall statement to be true.
This statement is false brain teaser?
Let us consider "This statement is false." This quotation could also be read as "This, which is a statement, is false," which could by extent be read as "This is a statement and it is false." Let's call this quotation P. The statement that P is a statement will be called Q. If S, then R and S equals R; therefore, if Q, then P equals not-P (since it equals Q and not-P). Since P cannot equal not-P, we know that Q is false. Since Q is false, P is not a statement. Since P says that it is a statement, which is false, P itself is false. Note that being false does not make P a statement; all things that are statements are true or false, but it is not necessarily true that all things that are true or false are statements. In summary: "this statement is false" is false because it says it's a statement but it isn't.
What is is called when a conditional and its converse are true and they are written as a single true statement?
It is an if and only if (often shortened to iff) is usually written as p <=> q. This is also known as Equivalence. If you have a conditional p => q and it's converse q => p we can then connect them with an & we have: p => q & q => p. So, in essence, Equivalence is just a shortened version of p => q & q => p .
If p q and q r then p r. Converse statement B.A syllogism C.Contrapositive statement D.Inverse statement?
Converse: If p r then p q and q rContrapositive: If not p r then not (p q and q r) = If not p r then not p q or not q r Inverse: If not p q and q r then not p r = If not p q or not q r then not p r
If pq plus qr pr statements must be true?
If ( pq ) and ( qr ) are both true statements, then it follows that both ( p ) and ( q ) must be true (since ( pq ) is true) and both ( q ) and ( r ) must be true (since ( qr ) is true). Consequently, this implies that ( q ) is true in both cases. However, we cannot definitively conclude the truth values of ( p ) or ( r ) without additional information. Thus, the statements themselves do not inherently guarantee the truth of ( p ) or ( r ) alone.
What is the sum or difference of p and q?
The sum of p and q means (p+q). The difference of p and q means (p-q).
