A huge practical application of trig is Fourier series. Fourier series says you can represent any periodic function as a sum of infinite sines and cosines. By constructively/destructively overlapping different frequencies with specific amplitudes, you can mimic a function, or signal, or different types of boundary conditions. With more terms, aka more frequencies, you get closer and closer to the actual function.
Fourier series is the only way to solve some types of differential equations. In digital signal processing, fourier series is extremely important because it gives the option of changing a time domain signal into a frequency domain signal. This allows you to manipulate signals in ways one couldn't imagine. Its used in filters, compression, data transmission, etc. The end results affect cell phones, televisions, any kind of digital filter, etc...
tan(9) + tan(81) = sin(9)/cos(9) + sin(81)/cos(81)= {sin(9)*cos(81) + sin(81)*cos(9)} / {cos(9)*cos(81)} = 1/2*{sin(-72) + sin(90)} + 1/2*{sin(72) + sin(90)} / 1/2*{cos(-72) + cos(90)} = 1/2*{sin(-72) + 1 + sin(72) + 1} / 1/2*{cos(-72) + 0} = 2/cos(72) since sin(-72) = -sin(72), and cos(-72) = cos(72) . . . . . (A) Also tan(27) + tan(63) = sin(27)/cos(27) + sin(63)/cos(63) = {sin(27)*cos(63) + sin(63)*cos(27)} / {cos(27)*cos(63)} = 1/2*{sin(-36) + sin(90)} + 1/2*{sin(72) + sin(36)} / 1/2*{cos(-36) + cos(90)} = 1/2*{sin(-36) + 1 + sin(36) + 1} / 1/2*{cos(-36) + 0} = 2/cos(36) since sin(-36) = -sin(36), and cos(-36) = cos(36) . . . . . (B) Therefore, by (A) and (B), tan(9) - tan(27) - tan(63) + tan(81) = tan(9) + tan(81) - tan(27) - tan(63) = 2/cos(72) – 2/cos(36) = 2*{cos(36) – cos(72)} / {cos(72)*cos(36)} = 2*2*sin(54)*sin(18)/{cos(72)*cos(36)} . . . . . . . (C) But cos(72) = sin(90-72) = sin(18) so that sin(18)/cos(72) = 1 and cos(36) = sin(90-36) = sin(54) so that sin(54)/cos(36) = 1 and therefore from C, tan(9) – tan(27) – tan(63) + tan(81) = 2*2*1*1 = 4
sin 2θ = 2(sin θ)(cos θ) cos 2θ = (cos θ)2 - (sin θ)2 cos 2θ = 2(cos θ)2 - 1 cos 2θ = 1 - 2(sin θ)2 tan 2θ = 2(tan θ)/[1 - (tan θ)2] sin θ/2 = ±√[(1 - (cos θ))/2] cos θ/2 = ±√[(1 + (cos θ))/2] tan θ/2 = ±√[(1 - (cos θ))/(1 + (cos θ))] ; cos θ ≠ -1 tan θ/2 = [1 - (cos θ)]/(sin θ) tan θ/2 = (sin θ)/[1 + (cos θ)]
if tan x = cos x then sin x / cos x = cos x => sin x = cos x cos x => sin x = cos2 x => sin x = 1 - sin2x => sin2x + sin x - 1 = 0 Using the quadratic formula => 1. sin x = 0.61803398874989484820458683436564 => x = sin-1 (0.61803398874989484820458683436564) or => 2. sin x = -1.6180339887498948482045868343656 => x = sin-1 (-1.6180339887498948482045868343656)
Well I don't exactly get "the solution", but simplifying the equation is quite simple. Maybe that's what you're looking for. Here are the steps for simplifying it. costancsc = 1 1. Change tan to sin/cos 2. Change csc to 1/sin cos(sin/cos)(1/sin) = 1 And as you can now see, the first cos cancels with the second one under the sin/cos fraction, and the first sin cancels with the second one under the 1/sin fraction consequentially leaving you with 1 = 1. For a better look, notice this fraction when all three parts are combined cos * sin * 1 ---------------- cos * sin See how the cos and sin cancel each other leaving you with 1 * 1 * 1 which is just 1. Therefore the final simplification is just 1 = 1. I hope this helps!
-1
To show that (cos tan = sin) ??? Remember that tan = (sin/cos) When you substitute it for tan, cos tan = cos (sin/cos) = sin QED
tan(9) + tan(81) = sin(9)/cos(9) + sin(81)/cos(81)= {sin(9)*cos(81) + sin(81)*cos(9)} / {cos(9)*cos(81)} = 1/2*{sin(-72) + sin(90)} + 1/2*{sin(72) + sin(90)} / 1/2*{cos(-72) + cos(90)} = 1/2*{sin(-72) + 1 + sin(72) + 1} / 1/2*{cos(-72) + 0} = 2/cos(72) since sin(-72) = -sin(72), and cos(-72) = cos(72) . . . . . (A) Also tan(27) + tan(63) = sin(27)/cos(27) + sin(63)/cos(63) = {sin(27)*cos(63) + sin(63)*cos(27)} / {cos(27)*cos(63)} = 1/2*{sin(-36) + sin(90)} + 1/2*{sin(72) + sin(36)} / 1/2*{cos(-36) + cos(90)} = 1/2*{sin(-36) + 1 + sin(36) + 1} / 1/2*{cos(-36) + 0} = 2/cos(36) since sin(-36) = -sin(36), and cos(-36) = cos(36) . . . . . (B) Therefore, by (A) and (B), tan(9) - tan(27) - tan(63) + tan(81) = tan(9) + tan(81) - tan(27) - tan(63) = 2/cos(72) – 2/cos(36) = 2*{cos(36) – cos(72)} / {cos(72)*cos(36)} = 2*2*sin(54)*sin(18)/{cos(72)*cos(36)} . . . . . . . (C) But cos(72) = sin(90-72) = sin(18) so that sin(18)/cos(72) = 1 and cos(36) = sin(90-36) = sin(54) so that sin(54)/cos(36) = 1 and therefore from C, tan(9) – tan(27) – tan(63) + tan(81) = 2*2*1*1 = 4
Remember that tan = sin/cos. So your expression is sin/cos times cos. That's sin(theta).
No. Tan(x)=Sin(x)/Cos(x) Sin(x)Tan(x)=Sin2(x)/Cos(x) Cos(x)Tan(x)=Sin(x)
When tan A = 815, sin A = 0.9999992 and cos A = 0.0012270 so that sin A + cos A*cos A*(1-cos A) = 1.00000075, approx.
You can't. tan x = sin x/cos x So sin x tan x = sin x (sin x/cos x) = sin^2 x/cos x.
'csc' = 1/sin'tan' = sin/cosSo it must follow that(cos) (csc) / (tan) = (cos) (1/sin)/(sin/cos) = (cos) (1/sin) (cos/sin) = (cos/sin)2
A useful property in Trigonometry is: tan(x) = sin(x) / cos(x) So, cos(x) tan(x) = cos(x) [ sin(x) / cos (x)] = sin(x)
Sine sum identity: sin (x + y) = (sin x)(cos y) + (cos x)(sin y)Sine difference identity: sin (x - y) = (sin x)(cos y) - (cos x)(sin y)Cosine sum identity: cos (x + y) = (cos x)(cos y) - (sin x)(sin y)Cosine difference identity: cos (x - y) = (cos x)(cos y) + (sin x)(sin y)Tangent sum identity: tan (x + y) = [(tan x) + (tan y)]/[1 - (tan x)(tan y)]Tangent difference identity: tan (x - y) = [(tan x) - (tan y)]/[1 + (tan x)(tan y)]
(sin(x)cot(x) - cos(x))/tan(x)(Multiply by tan(x)/tan(x))sin(x) - cos(x)tan(x)(tan(x) = sin(x)/cos(x))sinx - cos(x)(sin(x)/cos(x))(cos(x) cancels out)sin(x) - sin(x)0
The definition of tan(x) = sin(x)/cos(x). By this property, cos(x)tan(x) = sin(x).
The identity for tan(theta) is sin(theta)/cos(theta).