yes
* * * * *
Absolutely not! If it is divisible by 9 it must be divisible by 3.
Here, if you want it, is a proof:
x is divisible by 9 implies that x = 9*y for some integer y.
Now 9 = 3*3, so writing 3*3 instead of 9 gives
x = (3*3)*y
so, by the associative property of multiplication,
x = 3*(3*y)
and then, by the closure of multiplication of integers, 3*y is also an integer. Say, z, for example.
That is to say, x = 3*z
which is equivalent to saying that x is divisible by 3.
Using the tests for divisibility:Divisible by 3:Add the digits and if the sum is divisible by 3, so is the original number: 6 + 8 + 4 = 18 which is divisible by 3, so 684 is divisible by 3Divisible by 6:Number is divisible by 2 and 3: Divisible by 2:If the number is even (last digit divisible by 2), then the whole number is divisible by 2. 684 is even so 684 is divisible by 2.Divisible by 3:Already shown above to be divisible by 3. 684 is divisible by both 2 & 3 so 684 is divisible by 6Divisible by 9:Add the digits and if the sum is divisible by 9, so is the original number: 6 + 8 + 4 = 18 which is divisible by 9, so 684 is divisible by 9Thus 684 is divisible by all 3, 6 & 9.
Multiples of 9 and 6 are also divisible by three, the reverse is not true. 15 is divisible by 3, but not 6 or 9. 27 is divisible by 3 and 9, but not 6. 12 is divisible by 3 and 6, but not 9. 54 is divisible by 3, 6 and 9.
6
The one that has a 3, 6 or 9 there.
Every number is divisible by any non-zero number. Furthermore, 405 is evenly divisible by both 3 and 9.
The smallest number divisible by 3 6 and 9 is 18.
To determine which number is divisible by 3, 6, and 9, we need to check if the sum of the digits of each number is divisible by 3. For 369: 3+6+9 = 18, which is divisible by 3, 6, and 9. Therefore, 369 is divisible by 3, 6, and 9. For 246: 2+4+6 = 12, which is divisible by 3 but not by 6 or 9. Therefore, 246 is divisible by 3 but not by 6 or 9. For 468: 4+6+8 = 18, which is divisible by 3, 6, and 9. Therefore, 468 is divisible by 3, 6, and 9. For 429: 4+2+9 = 15, which is divisible by 3 but not by 6 or 9. Therefore, 429 is divisible by 3 but not by 6 or 9. Therefore, the numbers 369 and 468 are divisible by 3, 6, and 9.
No, 9 is divisible by 3 and 9, but not six 3 x 9 = 27, also not divisible by 6
Using the tests for divisibility:Divisible by 3:Add the digits and if the sum is divisible by 3, so is the original number: 6 + 8 + 4 = 18 which is divisible by 3, so 684 is divisible by 3Divisible by 6:Number is divisible by 2 and 3: Divisible by 2:If the number is even (last digit divisible by 2), then the whole number is divisible by 2. 684 is even so 684 is divisible by 2.Divisible by 3:Already shown above to be divisible by 3. 684 is divisible by both 2 & 3 so 684 is divisible by 6Divisible by 9:Add the digits and if the sum is divisible by 9, so is the original number: 6 + 8 + 4 = 18 which is divisible by 9, so 684 is divisible by 9Thus 684 is divisible by all 3, 6 & 9.
To check for divisibility by 9 sum the digits of the number and if this sum is divisible by 9 then so is the original number. For 32643: 3 + 2 + 6 + 4 + 3 = 18 which is divisible by 9 so 32643 is divisible by 9. As 9 = 3 × 3, any number divisible by 9 is also divisible by 3, thus as 32643 is divisible by 9 it is also divisible by 3. However, for completeness: to check for divisibility by 3 sum the digits of the number and if this sum is divisible by 3 then so is the original number. For 32643: 3 + 2 + 6 + 4 + 3 = 18 which is divisible by 3 so 32643 is divisible by 3.
999 is divisible by 9, but not by six; the next lower number divisible by 9 is 990, which is also divisible by 6, so that's the answer. Some shortcuts for divisibility: 0 is divisible by any number. If the last digit of a number is divisible by 2, the number itself is divisible by 2. If the sum of the digits of a number is divisible by 3, the number itself is divisible by 3. If the last TWO digits of a number are divisible by 4, the number itself is divisible by 4. If the last digit of a number is divisible by 5, the number itself is divisible by 5. If a number is divisible by both 2 and 3, it is divisible by 6. If the last THREE digits of a number are divisible by 8, the number itself is divisible by 8. If the sum of the digits of a number is divisible by 9, the number itself is divisible by 9. 990: 9+9+0=18, which is divisible by 9, so 990 is divisible by 9. 18 is also divisible by 3, so 990 is divisible by 3, and since 990 ends in 0 it's also divisible by 2, meaning that it's divisible by 6 as well.
9 is greater than 6 and divisible by 3.
A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is a multiple of 3. A number is divisible by 6 if the sum of its digits is a multiple of 3 and it's even. A number is divisible by 9 if the sum of its digits is a multiple of 9.
Using the tests for divisibility:Divisible by 3:Add the digits and if the sum is divisible by 3, so is the original number: 2 + 3 + 4 = 9 which is divisible by 3, so 234 is divisible by 3Divisible by 6:Number is divisible by 2 and 3: Divisible by 2:If the number is even (last digit divisible by 2), then the whole number is divisible by 2. 234 is even so 234 is divisible by 2.Divisible by 3:Already shown above to be divisible by 3. 234 is divisible by both 2 & 3 so 234 is divisible by 6Divisible by 9:Add the digits and if the sum is divisible by 9, so is the original number: 2 + 3 + 4 = 9 which is divisible by 9, so 234 is divisible by 9Thus 234 is divisible by all 3, 6 & 9.
6
No. For example, 9 is divisible by 3 and 9, but not 6. Even numbers that are divisble by 3 and 9 are also divisble by 6.
There is no number that is divisible by only 6 and 9 because any number is divisible by 1 and itself. Furthermore, any number that is divisible by 6 MUST be divisible by 2 as well as 3 - so only 6 is impossible.